| Content and Completeness of Portfolio |
10 |
The portfolio is comprehensive, includes all relevant materials (e.g., CV, teaching philosophy, videos), and showcases a strong teaching and artistic identity. (10) |
The portfolio is mostly complete but missing minor elements or lacks depth in some areas. (8) |
The portfolio is incomplete or lacks significant elements required to demonstrate teaching or artistic identity. (6) |
The portfolio is missing most required elements or is poorly constructed. (0) |
| Quality of Videos |
5 |
Teaching and/or performance videos are high-quality, clearly demonstrate skills, and are professionally hosted. (5) |
Videos are of good quality but may have minor issues (e.g., sound or video clarity). (4) |
Videos are of lower quality or fail to clearly demonstrate skills or professionalism. (3) |
Videos are unprofessional, irrelevant, or missing. (0) |
| Clarity and Organization |
3 |
The portfolio is well-organized, easy to navigate, and uses a professional format. (3) |
The portfolio is mostly well-organized but includes minor navigational or formatting issues. (2.5) |
The portfolio is disorganized or difficult to navigate, with significant formatting issues. (2) |
The portfolio is unclear, unprofessional, or incoherent. (0) |
| Professional Presentation |
2 |
The portfolio is polished, free of significant grammar or formatting errors, and demonstrates attention to detail. (2) |
The portfolio is mostly polished but contains minor grammar or formatting issues. (1.5) |
The portfolio contains noticeable errors that detract from its professionalism. (1) |
The portfolio is unprofessional, riddled with errors, or poorly executed. (0) |
