| Proposal |
20% of total |
Proposal is detailed, well-written, and clearly defines the type, scope, and purpose of the resources. (20% of total points) |
Proposal is mostly complete but lacks minor details or depth in scope. (15% of total points) |
Proposal is vague or incomplete, missing significant details or clarity. (10% of total points) |
Proposal is missing or fails to meet the project requirements. (0% of total points) |
| Content Quality |
40% of total |
Resources are highly relevant, well-researched, and demonstrate exceptional quality and usefulness for future students. (40% of total points) |
Resources are mostly relevant and useful but may lack minor refinement or detail. (30% of total points) |
Resources are somewhat relevant but lack depth, quality, or practical usefulness. (20% of total points) |
Resources are irrelevant, poorly executed, or missing. (0% of total points) |
| Production Value |
20% of total |
Video, audio, and/or print materials are polished, professional, and adhere to industry or educational standards. (20% of total points) |
Production is mostly polished but includes minor quality or formatting issues. (15% of total points) |
Production is inconsistent, with noticeable quality or formatting issues. (10% of total points) |
Production is unprofessional, incoherent, or incomplete. (0% of total points) |
| Clarity and Presentation |
20% of total |
Deliverables are professional, well-organized, and error-free, making them accessible and user-friendly. (20% of total points) |
Deliverables are mostly professional but include minor organizational or formatting issues. (15% of total points) |
Deliverables are poorly organized or contain noticeable errors that detract from usability. (10% of total points) |
Deliverables are unprofessional, riddled with errors, or unusable. (0% of total points) |
